The change clears a rights hurdle. It does not make a project on its own. A filmmaker still needs a story; a teacher needs a lesson students can use; a label needs listeners who care about its selections.

The recordings offer material. The business opportunity depends on what people make of it.

A Date Can Change the Rights Status

The Music Modernization Act gives recordings first published between 1923 and 1946 a 100-year term. The 1925 recordings entered the U.S. public domain at the start of 2026. That does not free every performance by those artists. It applies to the specific recordings in the cohort.

Nor does it automatically clear the song, image or recording file a creator finds online. A composition and a recording are separate works. W.C. Handy’s “The St. Louis Blues,” published in 1914, is already in the U.S. public domain. Smith and Armstrong’s 1925 performance is a separate asset. A later cover, a new restoration or an album photograph may have its own rights.

Anderson’s recording shows why a researcher should check more than one date. The Library of Congress catalogue gives the recording date as 1924. Duke University lists it among works published in 1925, which is the year relevant to this copyright schedule. A session date is not necessarily a publication date.

Five Possible Directions for New Work

1. Trace Who Made Money From “The St. Louis Blues”

Handy wrote the song; Smith and Armstrong made this recording theirs. Their version could anchor a documentary or podcast about the journey from composition to record, and about who received credit and income at each stage.

There is a useful lead in Handy’s own business history. The Library of Congress says he earned little from “Memphis Blues” but received a greater share of the profits from “St. Louis Blues.” A reporter could ask what changed: the contracts, the publishing arrangements, or Handy’s ability to control the business around his songs?

Use of the 1925 recording may be possible in the United States, but a production still has other pieces to clear. New music, images and later performances do not inherit the recording’s status.

2. Make Anderson’s Performance Teach Lesson

Anderson’s spiritual could sit at the centre of a lesson on interpretation, spirituals and musical arrangement. A teacher’s pack might include a short biography, a transcript and questions that direct students to particular moments in the performance.

The catalogue dates offer a teaching moment of their own. Students can compare the Library of Congress entry with Duke’s public-domain list and see why archivists and rights researchers pay attention to how a date is described. A publisher could put a sample lesson in front of music teachers before investing in a full course.

3. Give “Good Old Wagon” an Editorial Point of View

Smith’s “You’ve Been a Good Old Wagon” could open a curated blues collection built around humour, heartbreak or the sharp turns in a relationship. The collection would need more than tracks: a historian’s notes or a musician’s commentary could help listeners hear what links the songs.

That curation is the product. A small label could release a short edition or host a listening session first, then decide whether the idea merits a larger collection. A playlist with no point of view is easy to skip.

4. Let a Present-Day Band Answer Clarence Williams’ Blue Five

Play “Everybody Loves My Baby” in a room with musicians who can talk through what they hear. Then invite an ensemble to perform a new arrangement. A venue, festival or music school could build an evening around that exchange.

The original recording may be free to use, but the event is not free to produce. Musicians need to agree on fees, credit and any plans to record or stream the performance. Rehearsals, venue hire and promotion belong in the budget too.

5. Put the Performers’ Names In the Story

The listed performers on “If I Lose, Let Me Lose” include Louis Armstrong, Fletcher Henderson and Maggie Jones. A listening guide or podcast could follow their roles in the recording and give audiences a route to discover more of their work. Duke’s list and the Library of Congress provide records that can help verify the credits.

It is a simple editorial choice, but it changes how the recording is presented. The musicians become people whose contributions can be discussed, rather than names buried in a catalogue.

Start With a Small Audience

A classroom resource, one live event or a short podcast run can test an idea before a larger investment. Watch what people do: Do teachers use the materials? Do listeners turn up? Does anyone ask for another instalment?

Those answers won’t guarantee a business, but they can help shape the next decision. A documentary needs funding and distribution. A teaching product needs educators. A concert needs enough ticket buyers or sponsorship to cover its costs. Grants and institutional partners can help pay for early work; they do not remove the need to understand the numbers.

Check the Exact File

Keep the catalogue details for the recording you intend to use. The Library of Congress says users are responsible for assessing whether their use is lawful, and notes that publicity and privacy rights may also apply.

Then check the rest of the project: photographs, label scans, liner notes, restorations and later performances may all have different rights. Read the terms attached to any archive file you plan to distribute.

The public-domain change described here applies in the United States. A release offered in other countries may face different copyright rules, so check the markets where it will be available.

Legal Access Does Not Decide Who Benefits

Copyright expiration does not return past earnings to performers or ensure that future commercial use benefits the communities whose culture shaped the music. Those questions remain, even when a recording can legally be reused.

A producer can hire Black musicians and historians, pay for new performances, share revenue with collaborators and credit contributors clearly. None of those choices guarantees a hit. They can make the project more informed and create paid work around the archive.

The recordings are available. The challenge is to make something people will choose to hear, learn from or support.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I use Bessie Smith’s 1925 recordings in a U.S. film?

Recordings first published in 1925 entered the U.S. public domain on January 1, 2026. Confirm that you have the intended recording and check rights for the film’s other materials.

Does this cover every version of “The St. Louis Blues”?

No. The composition and each recording have separate rights histories. A later performance may still be protected.

Can I sample one of these recordings?

A qualifying 1925 recording may be reused in the United States. Check the source file for later material and keep its catalogue record.

Can a business sell products using the recordings?

Commercial reuse is allowed in the United States, but images, packaging and newer versions may have separate rights. Review the full product before sale.

Are the recordings public domain worldwide?

No. This change concerns U.S. law. Check the rules in each country where you plan to distribute or sell the work.

Where can I check recording details?

The Library of Congress National Jukebox and UCSB’s Discography of American Historical Recordings provide catalogue information. Check the specific entry and any terms attached to the audio file.

The post The Black Cultural Assets Entering the Public Domain: 5 Opportunities for Creators and Entrepreneurs appeared first on Black Elites.

Picture a founder returning from a week away to unanswered customer messages, invoices nobody followed up on and employees who waited for approval on routine decisions. The break may have been restful. The business test was less reassuring.

That dependence usually grows by inches. The founder knows a customer best, so every complaint goes to them. They understand the cash position, so every purchase needs their sign-off. They remember which supplier can deliver quickly, so nobody else makes the call.

These habits can help a young company get through a busy stretch. As the business grows, though, they can leave too much knowledge and authority with one person. For Black entrepreneurs, better systems cannot erase unequal access to capital or customers. The Federal Reserve tracks how small firms owned by people of different races experience operational challenges and seek credit; those experiences vary across firms and industries. A system can make the resources a business does have go further.

1. Write Down the Work People Ask You About Most

Start with the job someone has asked you to explain again. Maybe it is how to open the shop, prepare a client proposal, issue a refund or close out the day’s sales.

Write down how it happens in real life. Include who hands the work to whom, which tools are needed and when an employee should stop and ask for help. Don’t try to document everything at once. One checklist that a colleague can use tomorrow is better than a manual nobody has time to finish.

Michael E. Gerber, author of The E-Myth Revisited, makes documented work part of his argument for building a business that can operate without its owner:

All work in the model will be documented in Operations Manuals.

— Michael E. Gerber

Gerber’s essay adapts material from his book. The franchise comparison may sound ambitious for a small local company, but the everyday point holds: when essential work lives in the founder’s memory, the founder has to keep doing or explaining it.

2. Make Authority Clear Before Someone Needs It

Delegation can look complete on paper while the founder still approves every small decision. An employee handles the customer or prepares the order, then pauses to ask what they are allowed to do.

Set clear limits. Who can approve a refund, reorder supplies or change a shift? How much can they spend without checking in? Which issues need a manager right away? The answers depend on the business, but people should not have to guess.

World Wide Technology offers a useful example of leadership roles being held by more than one person. The company’s press kit identifies David L. Steward as founder and chairman of the board, and Jim Kavanaugh as co-founder and CEO. WWT also reports more than 14,000 team members and over 60 locations worldwide. Those company-reported details do not show whether Steward can take a week off without calls, or prove that a particular system drove the company’s growth. They do show a distinction between board leadership and the chief executive role at a large Black-founded company.

Steward has spoken about the risk of leaders seeing themselves as irreplaceable. Asked by Forbes why some executives resist naming a successor, he replied:

They think they’re indispensable. They think that the world revolves around them.

— David L. Steward

He was discussing succession, a much larger transition than a vacation. But the same problem can show up in ordinary decisions when every answer must come from the founder.

3. Keep the Money Legible

An account balance can look healthy on Monday and be spoken for by Friday. Payroll, taxes, rent, debt payments and overdue customer invoices all affect what the company can safely spend.

Keep the books current. A simple cash-flow view should show expected money in and out, upcoming bills and unpaid invoices. The IRS says good records help owners monitor their business, prepare financial statements and support tax returns.

The founder does not need to approve every payment. Someone should review unusual expenses, reconcile accounts and limit payment access to people who need it. A larger company might require two approvals. A small business may rely on restricted account access and a monthly review by an outside bookkeeper.

Those records matter when the owner is away, but also when a lender asks about cash flow or a customer has not paid. Black businesses do not share one financing experience; accurate accounts at least give owners a clearer picture of what the company can afford.

4. Give Customers a Reliable Route to Help

If a customer can get help only by contacting the founder, there is no real coverage. Set up a shared email address, service line or support channel, and assign someone to monitor it. Tell customers when to expect a response.

Staff need more than a channel. They should know what they can fix themselves. A missed delivery or appointment change may be straightforward; a safety complaint or suspected fraud needs a clear route to a manager. The owner can remain available for serious emergencies without being pulled into every routine exchange.

Listen to repeat complaints. If several customers are confused by the same fee or order update, a new script may not be enough. The policy, product page or process itself could be the problem.

5. Train Someone to Cover Essential Work

A procedure can be documented and still depend on one employee. If only one person knows how to run payroll, open the location, place a supplier order or manage bookings, the business has another weak spot.

Choose the tasks that would interrupt sales or service if they stopped. Train a second person to cover them. Let that person practise while the regular employee is available to answer questions. They do not need to do every part of the role as well as the person who owns it; they need to keep essential work from stopping.

Check access, too. Work logins belong in a secure password manager, with permissions matched to people’s roles. A crucial password saved in the founder’s phone is not a backup plan.

6. Put Relationship Knowledge Where Others Can Find It

The founder may know which supplier accepts split deliveries, what a long-standing client expects or when a contract comes up for renewal. If nobody else can find that information, a relationship can stall as soon as the owner is unavailable.

Keep contact details, contract terms, renewal dates and useful notes in a shared system. Name the employee who can speak for the company on each account. Restrict access to private customer and financial information.

This need not turn every conversation into a database entry. A short note about the last order or an unresolved question may be enough for a colleague to take over without asking a customer or supplier to start from zero.

7. Pick a Few Numbers Worth Watching

A dashboard can become busywork if nobody knows what to do with it. Choose a few measures that tell the team something useful: late orders, overdue invoices, cash on hand, open complaints, unfilled shifts or upcoming deadlines.

The right measures depend on the work. A restaurant may check staffing and inventory each morning. A consultancy may look at project deadlines and unpaid invoices weekly. A manufacturer may watch production delays and supplier deliveries. Pick a reporting rhythm people can maintain, and decide who follows up when a measure slips.

When the founder returns, look for patterns, not a log of every small decision. If customer complaints were handled but invoices piled up, that points to the next fix.

8. Try a Day Before You Try a Week

Start small. Spend a day away from routine messages, then try a long weekend. Before leaving, tell staff who is covering and what counts as an emergency. When you return, write down every call or approval they needed.

Maybe no one knew the refund limit. Maybe the person covering could not access the vendor portal. Each interruption points to a practical fix: clarify a decision, update the instructions, train a backup or change system access.

Use the exercise to review the setup, not blame employees for decisions they were never authorised to make. A smooth week also does not prove the business is ready to expand. New locations and larger contracts bring their own demands.

Some founders want a durable local business that supports their household and employees; others plan to grow. Either way, better systems cannot create customers or solve every financing problem.

The vacation test has a simpler job. It shows whether knowledge and authority are shared well enough for ordinary work to carry on. A business does not have to become independent of its founder. It should not need the founder for every answer.

Frequently Asked Questions

What Is the Founder’s Vacation Test?

It is a planned period away from routine decisions. The owner checks whether the team can keep essential work moving and notes where instructions, authority, staffing or system access are missing.

How Long Should the First Test Be?

Try a day or a long weekend first. Use what you learn to fix bottlenecks, then test again. A full week is more useful once routine work has clearer coverage.

Which System Should an Owner Build First?

Start with the task that causes the most interruptions or creates the biggest problem when delayed. Document it, assign someone to do it, set decision limits and identify a backup.

Can a Small Business Separate Financial Duties?

Not always; a small team may not have enough people. Restricted account access, regular bank reconciliation, outside bookkeeping or periodic review can add checks.

Does Passing the Test Mean the Business Is Ready to Scale?

No. It suggests some work can continue without the founder. Growth also depends on customers, cash, staffing, market conditions and the company’s ability to deliver consistently.

What If the Business Still Needs the Founder for Everything?

Note each interruption. Write down the decision that was needed, clarify who can make it next time, train a backup and repeat the test. Improve one process at a time.

The post The Founder’s Vacation Test: 8 Business Systems That Let Black Entrepreneurs Step Away appeared first on Black Elites.

A 2020 report from New York City’s Department of Small Business Services documented a gap between Black New Yorkers’ share of the population and their share of the city’s businesses. Black New Yorkers made up 22 percent of the population, or about 1.9 million people, while Black entrepreneurs owned 2 percent of the city’s businesses. The figures help explain why the city launched Black Entrepreneurs NYC in 2019.

A week of events cannot close that gap on its own. It could, however, give business owners access to customers, capital, and public agencies they might otherwise struggle to reach.

J1778 describes an expansion of Black Entrepreneurs Day, which the Hip Hop Summit Youth Council and Daymond John began in 2020. Earlier editions combined public conversations with grants, mentorship, and pitching. The New York proposal gives the initiative a larger calendar, but the resolution itself is limited: it was referred to the Senate Finance Committee on the day it was introduced. It proposes recognition and includes no grant funding or procurement requirements.

That leaves the practical work to organisers, funders, agencies and business partners.

From Audience to Opportunity

There is a record to build on. ABC News reported that nine businesses received $25,000 each through the 2023 Powershift Entrepreneur Grant. The NAACP says awardees also received mentorship from Daymond John.

The event has already tried different formats. In 2022, it added a Shopify-backed live pitch competition. Its fifth annual edition moved to Atlanta in 2024, where four corporate partners announced $100,000 in grants.

New York could build on that mix. A longer program might include founder clinics or meetings with buyers, lenders and procurement teams. The value would depend on whether those sessions lead to follow-up, and whether the organizers report what came of them.

A panel can put founders in a room with influential people. It cannot ensure a buyer reviews a product or a lender explains why a loan was declined. That takes individual meetings and someone responsible for keeping them moving.

John has described the personal history behind the event. He once sold hats outside Harlem’s Apollo Theater, the venue where he later hosted Black Entrepreneurs Day. In a Forbes interview, he said the event provided:

Hundreds of thousands of dollars in grants to black companies to stay open and/or expand their businesses — Daymond John

That history gives the New York edition a practical example to follow: name the recipients, explain the grant terms, and check in on how the money was used.

The city already has services that could extend the work beyond the event. Black Entrepreneurs NYC, launched in 2019 by the Department of Small Business Services and community partners, offers a 40-hour startup intensive. It also works with Volunteers of Legal Services to provide help with business formation, contracts, taxes and intellectual property. Organisers could direct founders to these programmes when they need support.

The Capital Founders Need

A pitch competition may suit one business. Another may need a loan, a grant or a customer willing to place a repeat order. The right support depends on the company and what it is trying to do. A software startup may pursue venture funding; a caterer or contractor may need working capital and reliable buyers.

The Federal Reserve Banks’ Small Business Credit Survey, fielded from September to November 2025, found that 32 percent of Black-owned employer firms that applied for loans, credit lines or cash advances received the full amount they sought. The finding applies to employer firms that sought financing. Among employer firms overall, reaching customers and growing sales was the most common operational challenge.

Ashley Sutton, founder of greeting-card company Hustle & Hope and a 2023 grant recipient, told ABC News:

I wanted to disrupt this $7 billion industry that hasn’t been innovated since pop-ups and music. — Ashley Sutton

Sutton said she planned to use the grant to expand her team and hire an intern. Her case shows what organisers can document: the company’s opportunity, what the funding paid for and the effect on its capacity. The New York programme could then look for similar opportunities to connect founders with buyers and capital providers.

What Follow-Through Could Look Like

Organisers could begin by publishing a short account of who took part: the businesses’ industries, boroughs and stages of growth. They could also record meetings with lenders, investors, buyers and support providers, then check which ones led to applications, purchase orders, contracts or further advice.

Those outcomes take time. A meeting does not guarantee a contract, and an application does not mean a loan was approved. Updates after three, six and twelve months would give organisers a way to report progress and explain where founders still need help.

Corporate partners could spell out their procurement steps and vendor requirements before meeting founders. A lender could offer a clear contact for follow-up. Public agencies and nonprofit providers could tell owners which services they qualify for and how to access them.

Revenue alone may not tell the whole story. A company could report higher sales while taking on debt or giving up a larger share of ownership to finance growth. With owners’ consent, organisers could also track repeat customers, contract renewals, jobs retained and business survival. Those figures would help show whether the support strengthened a company over time.

A new supplier may win a contract and still struggle to complete it. Insurance, certification, bookkeeping and delivery capacity can all affect whether the business gets paid. In some cases, invoice financing may be needed while the customer processes payment. A buyer who shares its requirements or places a small trial order can give a founder something useful to work with.

New York’s existing business services could help sustain that support after the week ends. Organisers can make introductions; agencies, lenders, corporations and nonprofits can keep working with founders afterward. A similar ecosystem approach appears in Felecia Hatcher’s work, which combines funding with investors and business support.

The event’s organizers will have a simple way to show whether the work continued: report what founders received, who followed up and what happened next. A founder who gets the supplier checklist, completes certification and secures a trial order may have more to show for the week than one who leaves with a photograph from the stage.

Frequently Asked Questions about New York’s First Black Entrepreneurs Week

What is New York’s planned Black Entrepreneurs Week?

Senate Resolution J1778 proposes recognising October 21–28, 2026, as Black Entrepreneurs Week. It links the week to Black Entrepreneurs Day, launched by the Hip Hop Summit Youth Council and Daymond John in 2020, and lists planned conversations with business and entertainment figures.

Has New York officially recognized the week?

The Senate introduced J1778 on March 18, 2026, and referred it to the Finance Committee. The resolution proposes recognition. It does not create a funded programme, grant or procurement rule.

What support has Black Entrepreneurs Day provided?

ABC News reported that nine businesses received $25,000 each through the 2023 Powershift Entrepreneur Grant. The NAACP says awardees also received mentorship from Daymond John. Those are reported forms of support; they do not establish how the businesses performed afterward.

Why do capital and customer access both matter?

Capital can help a business pay for inventory, staff or equipment. Customers bring in revenue. The support a founder needs will depend on the business and its plans.

What should organizers measure after October 21?

They could report meetings and introductions, then track which led to applications, grants paid, contracts, repeat customers, jobs retained or ongoing advice. Updates over time would show whether the relationships continued.

The post Why New York’s First Black Entrepreneurs Week Matters Beyond October 21  appeared first on Black Elites.

Two months later, Alsobrooks and Representative Ritchie Torres introduced a bill that would stop banks from making customers’ citizenship or immigration status a condition of service. The bill is still pending. The hearing did not change banking rules, but it gave the senators a public record to build on.

That sequence says something about Alsobrooks’ first years in Washington. She has used committee hearings, negotiations and legislation to push on issues that affect households and businesses. Her record includes a housing law and a role in shaping the GENIUS Act. Other priorities, including bank privacy and maternal health, remain proposals. Her influence is growing, though the effects of that work will depend on what Congress passes and agencies put into practice.

A Seat Across Four Committees

Alsobrooks arrived in Washington in January 2025 after serving as Prince George’s County executive. She became Maryland’s first Black senator and its first woman senator since Barbara Mikulski. Delaware’s Lisa Blunt Rochester joined her in the Senate that year, marking the first time two Black women had served there at once.

Alsobrooks sits on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs; Environment and Public Works; Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions; and the Special Committee on Aging. Her Banking subcommittees cover financial institutions and consumer protection, housing and community development, and securities and insurance. Those assignments place her in debates about credit, housing, infrastructure and financial markets.

Committee membership brings access to hearings and negotiations. It does not set the agenda by itself. Republicans control the Senate, and committee chairs and party leaders decide which proposals advance.

Alsobrooks has described her Banking subcommittees as a chance to advocate for ordinary people. What that platform delivers will depend on whether she can turn attention into support from colleagues, including across party lines.

These subcommittees provide a platform to fight on behalf of everyday people. — Angela Alsobrooks

Housing Is Her Clearest Legislative Win

Housing offers the clearest example of Alsobrooks helping move a priority into law. She voted for the ROAD to Housing Act in March 2026, then supported the revised 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act. The measure became Public Law 119-101 on July 11.

Her office said she worked on four parts of the package, including community investment, whole-home repairs, the HOME Investment Partnerships program and appraisal modernization.

The law updates federal housing programs. It has not yet shown whether it can bring down rents or help more families buy homes. That will depend on implementation, financing, construction costs and local decisions about where new housing can go.

Alsobrooks often connects housing policy to her own family. Her parents bought a modest home in their twenties. She has contrasted their experience with the later age at which many Americans now purchase a home. The story gives her position a personal dimension; the law’s eventual results will have to speak for themselves.

High housing costs also reach beyond households. Rent leaves workers with less to spend on transport, childcare and savings. Employers can struggle to recruit when staff cannot afford to live near work. In that sense, housing supply and affordability shape the local economy as well as family finances.

A Stablecoin Law, Plus a Bank Privacy Proposal

Alsobrooks’ most notable financial-regulation achievement so far is the GENIUS Act, a 2025 law that creates a federal framework for payment stablecoins. She was an original cosponsor and says she negotiated language to preserve state consumer protections and protect community banks.

The Senate passed the bill 68–30; the House approved it 308–122. It became Public Law 119-27 on July 18, 2025.

The GENIUS Act covers payment stablecoins, not every type of digital asset. Its provisions are scheduled to take effect by January 18, 2027, or earlier after federal regulators issue final rules. As of September 2026, the Federal Reserve had proposed implementation rules but had not finalised them. The statute is in place; the rules will determine how the framework works for banks, issuers and customers.

The Financial Access Protection Act is at an earlier stage. Alsobrooks and Torres introduced it on April 30, 2026. It would restrict federally regulated banks from collecting or disclosing customers’ citizenship or immigration status as a condition of service. The bill went to the Senate Banking Committee and has not become law.

The proposal speaks to a larger question about who can use the banking system. A business account helps an owner receive payments, run payroll and build a credit history. Black-owned employer businesses recorded $249 billion in receipts in 2023, according to the Census Bureau. That figure measures revenue, not profit, and excludes businesses without employees. A separate 2022 survey found Black-owned firms seeking loans, lines of credit or cash advances were among the groups least likely to receive full approval. 

Changing bank privacy rules would not close that financing gap. It could, however, affect the terms on which some customers approach financial institutions. The bill’s prospects remain uncertain.

Where Her Agenda Has Stalled

Alsobrooks has also tried to advance a working-family priority through the budget process. In April 2026, she offered Amendment 5294, a deficit-neutral reserve fund intended to support future legislation that would increase childcare funding. That later legislation could have capped family costs at seven percent of income.

The Senate rejected a motion to waive budget rules, 47–51, and then sustained a point of order. The amendment fell. No new childcare funding followed from it.

Other bills she has introduced have not yet moved far. The Social Determinants for Moms Act, co-sponsored with Senator Richard Blumenthal, would create a federal task force to study how housing, transportation and nutrition affect maternal health. It was referred to the Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee.

In June, Alsobrooks joined Republican Senator Dave McCormick to introduce the Regional Export Promotion Act. The proposal would test a partnership between the Export-Import Bank and local economic-development agencies, community development financial institutions, minority depository institutions, chambers of commerce, community banks and credit unions.

Alsobrooks’ office says the Export-Import Bank has provided more than $1 billion to Maryland businesses over the past decade. That is a historical figure, not a commitment of new money under the bill. The proposal’s value will depend on whether smaller companies can use those local connections to secure export financing.

She has used hearings to raise other concerns, too. At a June Banking Committee hearing, Alsobrooks argued that artificial intelligence should expand opportunity for families and small businesses. Her Environment and Public Works assignments give her another place to press for Maryland’s roads, ports, water systems and transit. Those roles create a platform. Funding and enforceable protections still require action from Congress and federal agencies.

Representation and the Work that Follows

In a PBS interview with Blunt Rochester, Alsobrooks described what it means to serve alongside another Black woman in the Senate. She also spoke about the ordinary support they give each other in a demanding workplace.

You don’t know whose life you’re touching or impacting by being of service, but that’s really what this moment is about. — Angela Alsobrooks

The quote offers a more personal view of representation than a tally of historic firsts. Alsobrooks took office 32 years after Carol Moseley Braun became the first Black woman elected to the Senate. Her presence changes who gets to ask questions and take part in decisions. She and Blunt Rochester do not have to share the same agenda for that change to matter.

Alsobrooks’ record is taking shape in laws, negotiations, hearings and proposals. The housing law and stablecoin framework are enacted. The bank privacy, maternal health and export bills are not. That distinction is central to judging her power.

So far, she has shown she can use a Senate seat to put issues before regulators, negotiate parts of legislation and work with a Republican colleague on a business proposal. Whether that amounts to a lasting shift will depend on what she helps pass and how the resulting policies affect people beyond Washington.

FAQs

What committees does Angela Alsobrooks serve on?

She serves on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs; Environment and Public Works; Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions; and the Special Committee on Aging. Her subcommittees cover financial institutions, consumer protection, housing, community development, and securities.

What housing law did Angela Alsobrooks support?

She voted for the ROAD to Housing Act. The revised 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act became Public Law 119-101 on July 11, 2026. Its effects will depend on implementation.

Did the Financial Access Protection Act become law?

No. Alsobrooks and Representative Ritchie Torres introduced the bill on April 30, 2026. It would restrict banks from collecting or disclosing customers’ citizenship or immigration status as a condition of service. It remains pending.

Why is Angela Alsobrooks’ Senate election historic?

She became Maryland’s first Black senator and its first woman senator since Barbara Mikulski. Her election alongside Lisa Blunt Rochester also marked the first time two Black women served in the Senate at the same time.

How can a freshman senator influence national policy?

A senator can question witnesses, conduct oversight, negotiate bills and seek support from colleagues. Committee assignments help, but party control, committee leadership and Senate rules also shape what advances.

What does Alsobrooks’ agenda mean for Black businesses?

Her work touches credit access, housing and infrastructure, all of which can affect business growth. The policies do not guarantee financing or remove disparities, but federal rules help shape the conditions businesses face.

The post A New Power on Capitol Hill: How Angela Alsobrooks is Reshaping the Senate appeared first on Black Elites.

Her research with computer scientist Timnit Gebru turned that question into evidence companies and policymakers could examine. The work did not solve AI bias. It changed the conversation around who gets to decide that a system is accurate, and what proof those claims require.

What Gender Shades measured

In 2018, Buolamwini and Gebru published Gender Shades, a study of three commercial gender-classification systems. The highest error rate for darker-skinned women reached 34.7%. For lighter-skinned men, the highest rate was 0.8%. These figures apply to the systems they tested and the task of classifying gender. They do not describe every facial-recognition product. The researchers also found that two widely used benchmarks contained far more lighter-skinned faces than darker-skinned ones. The study showed how the choice of test data can leave performance gaps hidden.

Personally, I have had to resort to literally wearing a white mask to have my face detected by some of this technology. — Joy Buolamwini,

For a company buying or selling facial technology, a good test result can be misleading if the test does not reflect the people who will encounter the product. A system may pass internal checks and still make more errors for some groups. That can become a costly problem when a customer uses it for identity checks, surveillance or access to services.

Buolamwini calls the human assumptions built into technology the “coded gaze.” People choose the data, define what the system should do and set the threshold for acceptable performance. Those decisions shape the product before a user ever sees it.

The study gave researchers and advocates specific questions to take to vendors: Which groups did you test? What errors did you measure? Does your benchmark resemble the people who will be affected? Those questions did not force companies to change their products, but they made general claims about accuracy easier to challenge.

Bringing the issue to lawmakers

Buolamwini founded the Algorithmic Justice League, an organization that combines research, advocacy and public education. It aims to give advocates evidence and draw attention to the people most affected by AI systems.

In 2019, Buolamwini testified before the U.S. Congress about facial recognition and civil rights. She raised concerns about the consequences of inaccurate systems in policing and called for stronger limits and oversight.

Mistaken identity is more than an inconvenience. — Joy Buolamwini

The distinction between facial analysis and facial recognition matters. Facial analysis classifies features or estimates attributes. Facial recognition compares faces to verify or identify someone. A wrong attribute classification and a false police match are different failures. The risks depend on what an organisation does with the result.

That last decision belongs to the buyer as well as the vendor. An agency chooses where to use the software, how much weight to give its output and whether someone can appeal. A technical error can have very different consequences depending on those choices.

Different systems, different risks

The National Institute of Standards and Technology tested 189 face-recognition algorithms from 99 developers in 2019. Its analysis used 18.27 million photographs of 8.49 million people. NIST found that demographic differences varied by algorithm and task. For some one-to-many searches, it reported higher false-positive rates for African American women.

A false positive occurs when a system wrongly identifies someone as a match. A false negative occurs when it misses a true match. Neither figure alone tells a buyer whether a product is suitable. A phone that fails to unlock and a police search that returns the wrong person call for different safeguards.

Several technology companies changed their policies in 2020. IBM said it would stop offering general-purpose facial-recognition and facial-analysis software. Microsoft said it would not sell facial-recognition technology to U.S. police departments until federal law grounded in human rights was in place. Amazon introduced a one-year moratorium on police use of Rekognition, then extended it indefinitely in 2021. The policies differed in scope; none created an industry-wide ban.

Researchers, employees, civil-rights advocates and lawmakers were all pressing companies at the time. Buolamwini’s work formed part of that wider pressure. The available evidence does not show that her research alone prompted each company’s decision.

The problem reaches beyond facial recognition

Automated decisions now appear in areas such as hiring, lending and health care. The technology changes, but a few practical questions remain: what is the system predicting, what data shaped it, and can a person learn why it reached a decision?

U.S. employment law applies when employers use software or AI to make or inform hiring decisions. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has explained how employers can assess whether a selection tool disproportionately excludes people in protected groups. This is existing civil-rights law being applied to new tools. It does not show that Buolamwini’s work directly produced the guidance.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has made a similar point about lending. Lenders must give applicants specific reasons when they deny credit, even when a complex algorithm makes those reasons hard to identify. The model’s complexity does not remove the lender’s obligation to explain its decision.

Health care provides a striking example of how a system can predict the wrong thing. Researchers studied an algorithm that used expected health-care costs to estimate patients’ need for extra care. Because the health system spent less on Black patients than on equally ill white patients, the algorithm assigned lower risk scores to many Black patients. The study estimated that correcting the bias would raise the share of Black patients identified for additional care from 17.7% to 46.5%. The system predicted spending, but spending was a poor measure of medical need.

That distinction has direct consequences for people. An automated decision can affect whether someone gets an interview, a loan or additional medical support. Companies may gain speed or reduce costs through automation. They still choose the data, the goal and how much influence the system has over a person’s options.

What regulation can require

Research can expose a failure. It cannot ensure that every company publishes test results or that every person harmed by an automated decision receives a remedy.

Washington state’s 2020 facial-recognition law sets requirements for government agencies using the technology. Agencies must prepare accountability reports and consult the public. The law also requires meaningful human review for certain significant decisions and provides for independent testing of performance differences. Its reach is limited to government use in Washington; it does not regulate every private use or every kind of AI.

There is no single technical fix for algorithmic discrimination. A system can fail because its data are unbalanced, its target is a poor proxy or its buyer uses it in a setting the developers did not test. Regular evaluation helps only when someone responds to the results. People affected by important decisions also need a way to question them.

Buolamwini’s research did not remove bias from AI. It helped make one set of failures measurable and harder to dismiss. Her influence lies in that shift, from a user’s complaint to evidence that companies and policymakers had to address. Whether AI systems improve will depend on what their builders and buyers do with that evidence.

FAQs

What did Joy Buolamwini find?

Facial-analysis software failed to detect Buolamwini’s face during an MIT art project until she wore a white mask. Her later research documented accuracy gaps across skin-tone and gender groups.

What did Gender Shades show?

The 2018 study tested three commercial gender-classification systems. Error rates reached 34.7% for darker-skinned women and 0.8% for lighter-skinned men in the systems tested.

Are facial analysis and facial recognition the same?

No. Facial analysis classifies or estimates facial attributes. Facial recognition compares faces to verify or identify someone. Their errors can have different consequences.

The post How Dr. Joy Buolamwini is Saving Artificial Intelligence from its Own Biases appeared first on Black Elites.