Former Stefon Diggs Employee Testifies for Second Day in NFL Assault Trial

The assault trial involving Stefon Diggs reached an important point on Tuesday as a former employee continued her testimony. She provided a detailed and emotional account that shapes one of the most closely watched legal battles in American sports this year.

Court proceedings at the Norfolk County District Court in Dedham, Massachusetts, have drawn strong public and media attention. This is not just because of the serious allegations but also due to the high profile of the defendant. He’s a former New England Patriots wide receiver, now facing felony and misdemeanor charges.

A Second Day of Testimony Deepens the Case

According to AP News, at the center of the trial is Jamila “Mila” Adams, Diggs’ former live-in chef, who returned to the stand for the second day in a row after sharing a dramatic account of the alleged incident from December 2025.

Adams told jurors that an argument turned violent inside Diggs’ home, stating that the NFL player “smacked me with an open hand” before putting his arm around her neck and restricting her breathing.

Her testimony described what she called a “complicated” relationship. Adams noted that they had known each other for years and were previously involved in a consensual sexual relationship before she began working for him.

This mix of personal and professional relationships has become a key focus in court, with both the prosecution and defense using it to shape their arguments.

Contrasting Narratives in Court

While Adams’ testimony has been detailed and emotional, Diggs’ legal team has firmly countered, claiming that the alleged assault “never happened.”

Defense attorney Andrew Kettlewell told jurors that there is no physical or forensic evidence to back up the claims, pointing out the lack of medical records, photographs, or eyewitness accounts.

The defense has also raised the possibility of a financial motive behind the accusations, suggesting that Adams sought compensation after reporting the incident. Prosecutors are expected to challenge this claim as testimony continues.

This sharp difference in narratives has defined the trial so far, leaving jurors to consider credibility, consistency, and intent rather than relying heavily on physical evidence.

What Happened: Inside the Alleged Incident

Court testimony indicates that the confrontation followed tensions between Adams and Diggs. This includes disputes over work conditions and personal disagreements.

Adams alleged that during the altercation, she was slapped, choked, and physically restrained, which left her struggling to breathe. She also mentioned that she did not immediately document injuries or seek medical care, a point the defense has used to question the reliability of her account.

Despite this, Adams has stood by her story during cross-examination, reaffirming that the incident occurred as she described.

Legal Stakes and Charges

Diggs has pleaded not guilty to all charges, which include felony strangulation and misdemeanor assault and battery.

The case originated from an incident said to have occurred on December 2, 2025. So far, it has transformed into a high-stakes courtroom battle with implications that go beyond legal matters.

If convicted, the charges could lead to serious legal consequences. Even without a conviction, the reputational impact has already been considerable.

Wider Implications for Career and League

Beyond the courtroom, the trial is taking place amid uncertainty regarding Diggs’ professional future. The wide receiver, who was released by the New England Patriots earlier in 2026, is currently a free agent.

The outcome of this trial could not only affect his chances of returning to the NFL but also fuel broader discussions about accountability, workplace relationships, and the behavior of athletes.

What Comes Next

As testimony continues, prosecutors are expected to build on Adams’ account, while the defense will intensify efforts to challenge inconsistencies and question credibility.

For now, the case remains unresolved. It is a legal battle characterized by conflicting accounts, limited physical evidence, and a jury tasked with deciding where the truth lies.

In high-profile trials like this, the courtroom serves more than just a venue for legal arguments; it becomes a test of narratives, credibility, and justice. As proceedings advance, all eyes remain on what the next day of testimony will reveal.