Analysis: Biden’s Pardon of Son Shows How Presidents Are Unfair

President Joe Biden’s decision to pardon his son, Hunter Biden, is a major moment in how presidents use their power to grant pardons. It has sparked a debate about justice, fairness, and whether this move sets a new standard for future leaders.

Biden had previously said he would not get involved in his son’s legal troubles. But now, he argues that Hunter’s treatment was unfair and driven by politics. Is this a father standing up for his son against injustice, or does it show a troubling use of presidential power?

Why Did Biden Pardon His Son?

Hunter Biden was convicted on gun charges and pleaded guilty to tax evasion, with sentencing just weeks away. Biden’s decision to pardon his son came after months of saying he wouldn’t interfere.

In his statement, Biden said the prosecution was harsher than usual for cases like Hunter’s. “People are almost never brought to trial on felony charges just for how they filled out a gun form,” he said, adding that tax issues are often resolved without criminal charges if the person repays their debt, as Hunter did.

Biden also said Hunter was targeted because he’s the president’s son. “In trying to break Hunter, they’ve tried to break me,” he said. Biden’s argument echoes the complaints made by former President Donald Trump, who often accused the justice system of being biased against him and his supporters.

How This Changes Pardons

This pardon adds to a growing trend of presidents using their clemency powers to help family members, allies, or supporters. Trump pardoned several close associates while in office, sparking criticism but facing few long-term political consequences.

Biden’s decision takes this trend further. By stepping in for his son, he’s setting a precedent that may encourage future presidents to use pardons in personal or political cases. Historically, pardons were guided by legal experts to ensure fairness, but this system now appears to be fading.

Critics from both sides of the political aisle have spoken out. Colorado Governor Jared Polis, a Democrat, said the decision was “disappointing” and would hurt Biden’s reputation. Republicans accused Biden of using his power to protect his family instead of upholding justice.

But since Biden is nearing the end of his political career, he likely won’t face significant personal consequences for this choice. The focus is already shifting to the incoming Trump administration.

What This Means for the Future

Biden’s pardon of Hunter shows how presidents are now using clemency powers to address what they see as unfair treatment of people close to them. While some believe this helps correct injustices, others say it damages public trust in the legal system.

Trump’s team has promised to “fix the justice system” when he returns to office. Trump is also expected to use pardons to help allies and supporters, including those convicted for their roles in the January 6 Capitol attack.

Biden’s decision may not stay in the spotlight for long, but it sets a new tone for how presidential pardons are used. As presidents take more personal or political action with this power, the impact on justice and accountability in America could be significant.